Syracuse

15-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.3%Syracuse

79.7%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -9.7

PROJECTED TOTAL142.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -393

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSyracuse 66

Projected Total142.6

Projected ScoreClemson 76

Team Comparison

SyracuseMetricClemson

52.2MMH Power Index59.9

109.2Offensive Efficiency112.6

106.6Defensive Efficiency101.4

2.6Net Efficiency11.2

5.6Strength of Schedule4.6

-15.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.0Tempo63.6

52.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.6%Turnover Rate14.0%

29.0%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

36.2%Free Throw Rate38.1%

1.8Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–106.6), net efficiency (11.2–2.6).

Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–4.6), offensive rebounding (29.0–27.0).

Final

Syracuse

75—90

Clemson

Clemson by 15 • 66.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SyracuseTEAM STATClemson

28-59FG32-57

47.0%FG%56.0%

8-223PT11-26

36.0%3PT%42.0%

11-16FT15-16

69.0%FT%94.0%

26Rebounds33

8Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists17

7Turnovers10

4Steals5

—Blocks3

16Fouls14

Player Box Score

Syracuse

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Judah Mintz	Guard	40	8-21	0-4	4-7	3	4	0	20
Quadir Copeland	G	28	6-13	3-6	2-3	2	1	1	17
Maliq Brown	F	40	5-7	0-0	2-2	11	1	2	12
J.J. Starling	G	27	4-8	1-4	1-2	1	3	0	10
Kyle Cuffe Jr.	G	13	3-4	3-4	0-0	0	0	0	9
Chris Bell	F	37	2-6	1-4	2-2	4	0	1	7
Justin Taylor	G	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Hall	Center	33	11-19	2-6	1-2	7	0	0	1	25
Joseph Girard III	Guard	37	5-8	4-7	7-7	3	4	0	0	21
Chase Hunter	Guard	37	7-14	3-8	0-0	1	3	0	0	17
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	36	5-5	1-1	5-5	16	3	2	0	16
Jack Clark	Forward	28	3-6	1-3	0-0	1	5	3	1	7
Chauncey Wiggins	F	12	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	2
RJ Godfrey	F	10	0-1	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	1	2
Dillon Hunter	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Joshua Beadle	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1

113.5Offensive Efficiency136.2

136.2Defensive Efficiency113.5

-22.7Net Efficiency22.7

54.2%Effective FG%65.8%

56.3%True Shooting %69.7%

10.7%Turnover Rate15.0%

27.1%Free Throw Rate28.1%

37.3%3-Point Rate45.6%

1.29Assist / Turnover1.70

Game Summary

Clemson won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.