Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.0%Binghamton
97.0%UMBC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -23.0
PROJECTED TOTAL137.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -3233
UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 57
Projected Total137.4
Projected ScoreUMBC 80

Team Comparison

32.4MMH Power Index59.1
102.2Offensive Efficiency113.0
112.3Defensive Efficiency99.0
-10.1Net Efficiency14.0
-6.0Strength of Schedule-5.6
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency24.7
64.2Tempo65.5
51.3%Effective FG%54.3%
18.5%Turnover Rate14.3%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %25.2%
42.8%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-6.5Average Margin9.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (113.0–102.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.3), net efficiency (14.0–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–34.1).
Final
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
72—71
UMBC logo
UMBC
Binghamton by 1 • 69.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATUMBC
27-60FG27-60
45.0%FG%45.0%
7-223PT4-14
32.0%3PT%29.0%
11-17FT13-16
65.0%FT%81.0%
38Rebounds33
11Offensive Rebounds7
15Assists9
12Turnovers10
7Steals3
1Blocks6
14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nehemiah BensonForward278-130-00-051010016
Tymu CheneryGuard405-113-82-242100015
Armon HarriedGuard396-152-51-274100015
Dan PetcashGuard282-42-42-27310008
Gavin WalshF272-70-34-87030008
Tariq BalogunForward182-50-02-32200006
Chris WalkerG122-50-20-01110004
Masud StewartGuard90-00-00-01200000
UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dion BrownG3510-211-63-591140024
Marcus Banks Jr.G377-182-53-332000019
Ace ValentineG324-51-10-06120009
Khydarius SmithCenter72-50-02-23000006
Max Lorca-LloydCenter302-50-01-23301005
Regimantas CiunysF201-20-02-23000004
Devan SappGuard160-00-02-20000002
Franck EmmouG121-40-20-00101002
Alpha ChibambeForward70-00-00-02000000
Bryce JohnsonGuard40-00-00-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

69.9Possessions69.9
103.0Offensive Efficiency101.6
101.6Defensive Efficiency103.0
1.4Net Efficiency-1.4
50.8%Effective FG%48.3%
52.9%True Shooting %52.5%
17.4%Turnover Rate14.2%
28.3%Free Throw Rate26.7%
36.7%3-Point Rate23.3%
1.25Assist / Turnover0.90
Game Summary
Binghamton won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 69.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.