Pacific

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

68.2%Pacific

31.8%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPacific -5.5

PROJECTED TOTAL147.8

MODEL MONEYLINEPacific -214

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePacific 77

Projected Total147.8

Projected ScorePepperdine 71

Team Comparison

PacificMetricPepperdine

49.6MMH Power Index38.2

109.9Offensive Efficiency103.2

104.0Defensive Efficiency113.6

5.9Net Efficiency-10.4

-1.5Strength of Schedule0.7

-5.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

66.2Tempo70.0

53.5%Effective FG%48.7%

19.7%Turnover Rate18.3%

35.3%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

30.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%

3.9Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Pacific HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPacific holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–38.2), offensive efficiency (109.9–103.2), defensive efficiency (104.0–113.6), net efficiency (5.9–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-1.5), ball security (18.3–19.7), free throw rate (34.0–30.9).

Final

Pacific

43—102

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 59 • 73.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PacificTEAM STATPepperdine

14-56FG39-65

25.0%FG%60.0%

5-233PT7-19

22.0%3PT%37.0%

10-17FT17-24

59.0%FT%71.0%

26Rebounds50

8Offensive Rebounds13

10Assists28

16Turnovers11

5Steals7

2Blocks2

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Pacific

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Judson Martindale	Forward	33	5-11	2-5	0-0	2	0	1	2	12
Nick Blake	Guard	27	1-6	0-4	6-8	3	5	2	0	8
Donovan Williams	Guard	24	2-8	2-2	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Cam Denson	F	13	2-4	0-1	0-2	0	0	0	0	4
Makai Richards	C	11	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Tyler Beard	Guard	15	1-5	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Maurice Odum	G	17	0-6	0-2	2-2	3	2	0	0	2
Lesown Hallums Jr.	Guard	11	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Burke Smith	Forward	12	0-2	0-1	1-3	5	0	0	0	1
Greydon Edwards	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Tan Yildizoglu	G	12	0-4	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Villiam Garcia Adsten	G	12	0-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	0	0
Jalen Brown	Guard	11	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jevon Porter	F	32	8-17	2-6	10-11	11	3	0	1	28
Michael Ajayi	F	35	8-13	1-3	4-6	17	3	1	0	21
Malik Messina-Moore	G	29	6-8	3-4	0-0	4	4	1	0	15
Cord Stansberry	G	22	4-8	0-2	2-4	4	3	2	0	10
Nils Cooper	G	22	4-4	0-0	0-1	3	3	2	0	8
Ethan Anderson	Guard	25	3-5	0-1	0-0	0	6	0	0	6
David Mager	G	3	3-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Curtis Williams	Guard	16	1-3	1-2	1-2	1	3	1	0	4
John Squire	F	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	1	2
Paul Jordan	Forward	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Aladji Gassama	Center	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.3Possessions73.3

58.7Offensive Efficiency139.2

139.2Defensive Efficiency58.7

-80.5Net Efficiency80.5

29.5%Effective FG%65.4%

33.6%True Shooting %66.8%

22.2%Turnover Rate14.8%

30.4%Free Throw Rate36.9%

41.1%3-Point Rate29.2%

0.63Assist / Turnover2.55

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 59 points. The game played at approximately 73.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.