Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.2%Grambling

64.8%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -4.0

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -184

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 69

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 73

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricAlabama A&M

41.4MMH Power Index42.3

100.7Offensive Efficiency105.9

100.4Defensive Efficiency106.6

0.3Net Efficiency-0.7

-5.7Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

69.9Tempo68.0

49.2%Effective FG%49.7%

20.9%Turnover Rate16.8%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

42.2%Free Throw Rate45.7%

0.2Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.7), recent form (3.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.6), net efficiency (0.3–-0.7), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.8).

Final

Grambling

74—73

Alabama A&M

Grambling by 1 • 70.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATAlabama A&M

22-45FG26-58

49.0%FG%45.0%

2-63PT3-13

33.0%3PT%23.0%

28-33FT18-23

85.0%FT%78.0%

29Rebounds29

8Offensive Rebounds12

6Assists12

17Turnovers15

11Steals10

2Blocks—

23Fouls24

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	30	3-6	1-2	10-13	4	2	6	0	17
Jourdan Smith	Guard	22	4-7	0-0	5-6	4	1	2	1	13
Antwan Burnett	G	37	5-9	1-2	1-1	6	1	0	0	12
Kintavious Dozier	G	31	3-8	0-1	4-4	4	0	2	0	10
Jonathan Aku	Forward	19	3-6	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	1	6
Mikale Stevenson	G	16	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	2
Zahad Munford	Guard	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Malik Lamin	Center	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Quintin Murrell	Guard	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Omari Peek	Guard	30	9-17	1-1	3-3	5	4	3	22
Cameron Tucker	Guard	33	2-8	0-2	6-6	4	0	2	10
Jayland Randall	G	19	3-5	0-1	3-4	1	3	1	9
Chad Moodie	F	15	4-4	0-0	1-2	3	0	1	9
EJ Williams	Center	11	3-6	0-0	0-1	4	0	0	6
London Riley	Guard	21	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	0	1	3
William Tavares	Center	9	1-2	0-0	1-2	4	1	0	3
AC Bryant	G	7	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	1	3
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	14	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	2
Austin Harvell	Forward	7	0-2	0-1	2-2	0	0	0	2
Eric Lee	Guard	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	2
Dylan Mclean	Guard	6	0-0	0-0	2-3	1	1	0	2
Darius Osborne	Forward	16	0-4	0-2	0-0	4	0	0	0
Caleb Blackwell	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.8Possessions70.8

104.5Offensive Efficiency103.1

103.1Defensive Efficiency104.5

1.4Net Efficiency-1.4

51.1%Effective FG%47.4%

61.0%True Shooting %53.0%

24.4%Turnover Rate20.9%

73.3%Free Throw Rate39.7%

13.3%3-Point Rate22.4%

0.35Assist / Turnover0.80

Game Summary

Grambling won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 70.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.