Longwood

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.9%Longwood

95.1%High Point

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -20.6

PROJECTED TOTAL159.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -1941

High Point

31-5

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLongwood 70

Projected Total159.8

Projected ScoreHigh Point 90

Team Comparison

LongwoodMetricHigh Point

47MMH Power Index69

108.1Offensive Efficiency123.8

103.0Defensive Efficiency98.3

5.1Net Efficiency25.5

-6.4Strength of Schedule-5.8

2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency16.5

71.9Tempo72.4

51.4%Effective FG%56.6%

19.3%Turnover Rate12.8%

35.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

42.0%Free Throw Rate42.4%

3.6Average Margin18.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–47.0), offensive efficiency (123.8–108.1), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.0), net efficiency (25.5–5.1).

Longwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.4–33.2).

Final

Longwood

80—79

High Point

Longwood by 1 • 72.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LongwoodTEAM STATHigh Point

26-59FG24-61

44.0%FG%39.0%

8-153PT11-33

53.0%3PT%33.0%

20-28FT20-27

71.0%FT%74.0%

40Rebounds35

13Offensive Rebounds14

16Assists10

14Turnovers12

4Steals5

4Blocks2

22Fouls21

Player Box Score

Longwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Szymon Zapala	Center	16	6-8	0-0	5-6	6	0	0	3	17
Walyn Napper	Guard	41	6-18	3-5	1-2	4	7	3	0	16
Elijah Tucker	F	25	5-5	0-0	3-6	4	0	0	1	13
Michael Christmas	Forward	36	3-8	3-4	3-4	7	1	1	0	12
Johnathan Massie	Guard	32	1-7	1-2	5-6	7	5	0	0	8
Johan Nziemi	F	5	2-4	0-0	2-2	4	0	0	0	6
D'Avian Houston	G	17	1-2	1-1	1-2	2	1	0	0	4
Emanuel Richards	G	31	1-5	0-2	0-0	4	2	0	0	2
Jesper Granlund	Forward	21	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kezza Giffa	G	37	8-16	2-8	14-14	2	0	0	0	32
Duke Miles	G	28	5-9	4-5	1-2	1	2	0	0	15
Trae Benham	Guard	29	3-6	2-5	0-0	3	2	2	0	8
Kimani Hamilton	F	45	3-11	0-2	0-0	10	2	2	1	6
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	19	2-2	0-0	1-4	6	0	0	0	5
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	30	1-10	1-6	1-2	2	1	1	0	4
Denzel Hines	F	14	1-3	1-3	1-3	0	1	0	1	4
Titas Sargiunas	F	11	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	2	0	0	3
Pavlo Dziuba	Forward	12	0-0	0-0	2-2	5	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

72.6Possessions72.6

110.2Offensive Efficiency108.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency110.2

1.4Net Efficiency-1.4

50.8%Effective FG%48.4%

55.3%True Shooting %53.5%

19.1%Turnover Rate16.7%

47.5%Free Throw Rate44.3%

25.4%3-Point Rate54.1%

1.14Assist / Turnover0.83

Game Summary

Longwood won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 72.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.