West Virginia

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.6%West Virginia

74.4%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL137.8

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -291

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWest Virginia 65

Projected Total137.8

Projected ScoreCincinnati 72

Team Comparison

West VirginiaMetricCincinnati

56.5MMH Power Index61.5

108.2Offensive Efficiency105.3

100.7Defensive Efficiency97.3

7.5Net Efficiency8.0

2.9Strength of Schedule5.1

1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

65.3Tempo69.4

51.5%Effective FG%50.6%

16.8%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

35.6%Free Throw Rate30.7%

4.9Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–56.5), defensive efficiency (97.3–100.7), net efficiency (8.0–7.5), strength of schedule (5.1–2.9).

West Virginia COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.2–105.3), shooting efficiency (51.5–50.6), ball security (16.8–17.0).

Final

West Virginia

56—92

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 36 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

West VirginiaTEAM STATCincinnati

21-54FG36-61

39.0%FG%59.0%

8-193PT8-27

42.0%3PT%30.0%

6-10FT12-16

60.0%FT%75.0%

23Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds11

8Assists23

16Turnovers9

6Steals10

3Blocks5

13Fouls15

Player Box Score

West Virginia

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noah Farrakhan	Guard	22	5-9	2-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	12
RaeQuan Battle	Guard	23	4-10	1-4	0-0	4	1	2	1	9
Josiah Harris	F	22	2-5	2-4	2-2	2	2	0	0	8
Jesse Edwards	Center	18	4-7	0-0	0-1	4	0	1	1	8
Quinn Slazinski	Forward	23	2-6	1-2	2-2	1	4	2	0	7
Kerr Kriisa	G	32	2-7	2-6	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Kobe Johnson	Guard	27	2-5	0-0	2-2	2	0	1	0	6
Patrick Suemnick	F	22	0-1	0-0	0-3	2	0	0	1	0
Seth Wilson	Guard	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Ofri Naveh	F	3	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Aden Tagaloa-Nelson	Guard	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dan Skillings Jr.	G	28	5-8	1-3	6-8	4	2	1	2	17
John Newman III	Forward	28	7-10	0-3	0-0	6	4	2	0	14
Jamille Reynolds	Forward	17	6-6	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	2	13
Simas Lukosius	Guard	31	3-11	3-10	3-4	3	5	0	0	12
Aziz Bandaogo	Forward	21	4-4	0-0	1-2	7	0	0	0	9
Jizzle James	G	22	4-7	0-2	0-0	3	3	0	0	8
Day Day Thomas	G	32	3-8	1-5	0-0	6	7	5	0	7
Josh Reed	F	14	2-4	1-2	0-0	3	1	2	0	5
Landen Long	Guard	1	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Ody Oguama	Forward	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Chase Kirkwood	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Sage Tolentino	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
CJ Anthony	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

85.2Offensive Efficiency140.0

140.0Defensive Efficiency85.2

-54.8Net Efficiency54.8

46.3%Effective FG%65.6%

47.7%True Shooting %67.1%

24.7%Turnover Rate13.5%

18.5%Free Throw Rate26.2%

35.2%3-Point Rate44.3%

0.50Assist / Turnover2.56

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 36 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.