Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.2%Texas A&M

48.8%Ole Miss

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL156.5

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -105

Ole Miss

15-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 78

Projected Total156.5

Projected ScoreOle Miss 78

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricOle Miss

58MMH Power Index53

116.1Offensive Efficiency109.2

108.4Defensive Efficiency109.5

7.7Net Efficiency-0.3

4.8Strength of Schedule5.4

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3

69.1Tempo69.5

53.5%Effective FG%50.6%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.0%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

37.5%Free Throw Rate33.8%

5.3Average Margin-0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–53.0), offensive efficiency (116.1–109.2), defensive efficiency (108.4–109.5), net efficiency (7.7–-0.3).

Ole Miss COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.4–4.8), recent form (-2.3–-7.2), ball security (14.0–14.8).

Final

Texas A&M

86—60

Ole Miss

Texas A&M by 26 • 66.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATOle Miss

32-64FG22-56

50.0%FG%39.0%

13-263PT8-28

50.0%3PT%29.0%

9-15FT8-16

60.0%FT%50.0%

50Rebounds21

18Offensive Rebounds5

19Assists13

12Turnovers9

8Steals8

2Blocks3

13Fouls11

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Manny Obaseki	Guard	20	9-14	4-5	3-7	1	2	1	0	25
Tyrece Radford	Guard	31	8-15	3-5	0-0	10	4	1	0	19
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	30	7-14	5-9	0-0	5	7	2	0	19
Solomon Washington	F	29	4-7	0-1	2-2	10	2	2	2	10
Henry Coleman III	Forward	9	2-2	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	5
Jace Carter	Not Available	23	1-6	0-2	1-2	3	0	0	0	3
Hayden Hefner	Guard	10	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	3
Andersson Garcia	Forward	29	0-0	0-0	2-2	13	3	0	0	2
Wildens Leveque	Forward	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Eli Lawrence	Guard	5	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jaelyn Lee	G	3	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Ole Miss

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylen Murray	Guard	31	8-17	3-9	2-2	1	3	3	0	21
Matthew Murrell	Guard	31	4-13	1-9	2-5	2	2	2	0	11
Jaemyn Brakefield	Forward	29	3-9	1-3	3-7	4	2	0	0	10
T.J. Caldwell	G	18	3-4	1-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	7
Austin Nunez	G	14	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Cole McGrath	Guard	7	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Allen Flanigan	Guard	21	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	2	2	0	2
Jamarion Sharp	Forward	16	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	2	2
Cam Brent	Guard	6	0-2	0-1	1-2	0	1	1	0	1
Moussa Cisse	Center	20	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Brandon Murray	Not Available	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Rashaud Marshall	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4

129.5Offensive Efficiency90.4

90.4Defensive Efficiency129.5

39.2Net Efficiency-39.2

60.2%Effective FG%46.4%

60.5%True Shooting %47.2%

18.4%Turnover Rate13.3%

23.4%Free Throw Rate28.6%

40.6%3-Point Rate50.0%

1.58Assist / Turnover1.44

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.