
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.9%SMU
47.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL161.4
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -112

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 80
Projected Total161.4
Projected ScoreUAB 81
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index56.9
118.2Offensive Efficiency110.5
109.6Defensive Efficiency102.9
8.6Net Efficiency7.6
7.0Strength of Schedule0.4
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
71.1Tempo71.7
55.7%Effective FG%48.8%
15.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
31.3%Free Throw Rate36.9%
6.1Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–56.9), offensive efficiency (118.2–110.5), net efficiency (8.6–7.6), strength of schedule (7.0–0.4).
UAB COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–109.6), recent form (2.9–-1.3), ball security (12.4–15.7).