West Virginia

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.6%West Virginia

74.4%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -7.2

PROJECTED TOTAL137.8

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -291

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWest Virginia 65

Projected Total137.8

Projected ScoreCincinnati 72

Team Comparison

West VirginiaMetricCincinnati

56.5MMH Power Index61.5

108.2Offensive Efficiency105.3

100.7Defensive Efficiency97.3

7.5Net Efficiency8.0

2.9Strength of Schedule5.1

1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

65.3Tempo69.4

51.5%Effective FG%50.6%

16.8%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

35.6%Free Throw Rate30.7%

4.9Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–56.5), defensive efficiency (97.3–100.7), net efficiency (8.0–7.5), strength of schedule (5.1–2.9).

West Virginia COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (108.2–105.3), shooting efficiency (51.5–50.6), ball security (16.8–17.0).

Final

West Virginia

85—90

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 5 • 68.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

West VirginiaTEAM STATCincinnati

31-56FG29-65

55.0%FG%45.0%

10-223PT16-38

45.0%3PT%42.0%

13-18FT16-21

72.0%FT%76.0%

32Rebounds36

6Offensive Rebounds14

18Assists17

9Turnovers8

4Steals4

3Blocks2

18Fouls18

Player Box Score

West Virginia

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jesse Edwards	Center	25	7-8	0-0	3-7	5	1	1	2	17
Quinn Slazinski	Forward	27	4-8	3-5	4-4	7	4	0	0	15
RaeQuan Battle	Guard	25	6-12	2-5	0-0	3	2	1	1	14
Kerr Kriisa	G	37	4-10	2-6	3-3	1	7	2	0	13
Josiah Harris	F	20	3-5	3-4	1-2	9	1	0	0	10
Kobe Johnson	Guard	30	4-6	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	8
Seth Wilson	Guard	12	2-4	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Akok Akok	Forward	8	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Patrick Suemnick	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Noah Farrakhan	Guard	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Simas Lukosius	Guard	37	8-13	7-12	8-8	2	4	1	0	31
Day Day Thomas	G	34	10-18	7-10	2-2	2	2	0	0	29
Dan Skillings Jr.	G	37	5-12	1-5	2-4	5	4	2	0	13
Aziz Bandaogo	Forward	26	2-5	0-0	2-5	13	3	0	1	6
Jizzle James	G	17	1-6	0-4	2-2	2	1	0	0	4
Jamille Reynolds	Forward	14	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	0	4
John Newman III	Forward	26	1-5	1-4	0-0	4	2	0	1	3
Josh Reed	F	9	0-3	0-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.3Possessions68.3

124.5Offensive Efficiency131.8

131.8Defensive Efficiency124.5

-7.3Net Efficiency7.3

64.3%Effective FG%56.9%

65.8%True Shooting %60.0%

13.3%Turnover Rate11.6%

32.1%Free Throw Rate32.3%

39.3%3-Point Rate58.5%

2.00Assist / Turnover2.13

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 68.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.