Wagner logo

Wagner

14-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.3%Wagner
84.7%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -554
Merrimack logo

Merrimack

23-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWagner 64
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreMerrimack 75

Team Comparison

42.9MMH Power Index53.7
105.5Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.1Defensive Efficiency103.2
-0.6Net Efficiency3.2
-5.0Strength of Schedule0.7
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
67.6Tempo64.4
50.2%Effective FG%49.3%
18.9%Turnover Rate14.8%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
31.6%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-0.4Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–42.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–105.5), defensive efficiency (103.2–106.1), net efficiency (3.2–-0.6).
Wagner COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (50.2–49.3), offensive rebounding (34.0–24.7).
Final
Wagner logo
Wagner
54—47
Merrimack logo
Merrimack
Wagner by 7 • 58.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WagnerTEAM STATMerrimack
22-49FG17-57
45.0%FG%30.0%
2-153PT10-38
13.0%3PT%26.0%
8-14FT3-3
57.0%FT%100.0%
42Rebounds27
10Offensive Rebounds8
5Assists12
12Turnovers9
2Steals5
2Blocks2
10Fouls14

Player Box Score

Wagner
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tahron AllenNot Available408-161-25-871010022
Melvin Council Jr.G406-150-50-140100012
Javier EzquerraG403-81-52-34110009
Keyontae LewisF294-60-00-012001008
Seck ZongoForward111-10-00-02000002
Julian BrownGuard370-30-31-28300001
Tyje KeltonF30-00-00-01000000
Merrimack
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Devon SavageGuard366-144-120-060000016
Jordan McKoyGuard253-83-82-230000011
Adam ClarkG404-140-10-05720008
Jacob O'ConnellForward132-31-20-00001005
Jordan DerkackG341-111-101-14210004
Bryan EtumnuF271-41-30-04011003
Samba DialloForward200-30-20-02210000
Jaylen StinsonG50-00-00-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

58.6Possessions58.6
92.2Offensive Efficiency80.2
80.2Defensive Efficiency92.2
11.9Net Efficiency-11.9
46.9%Effective FG%38.6%
48.5%True Shooting %40.2%
20.8%Turnover Rate15.1%
28.6%Free Throw Rate5.3%
30.6%3-Point Rate66.7%
0.42Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
Wagner won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 58.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.