
Oklahoma
21-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.0%Oklahoma
56.0%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -3.2
PROJECTED TOTAL158.2
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -127

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOklahoma 77
Projected Total158.2
Projected ScoreTCU 81
Team Comparison
62.1MMH Power Index59.7
119.5Offensive Efficiency110.2
111.6Defensive Efficiency102.7
7.9Net Efficiency7.5
3.2Strength of Schedule4.6
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.4Tempo70.2
55.1%Effective FG%50.5%
14.4%Turnover Rate15.3%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
36.2%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.5Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–59.7), offensive efficiency (119.5–110.2), net efficiency (7.9–7.5), recent form (12.3–2.2).
TCU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–111.6), strength of schedule (4.6–3.2), offensive rebounding (33.6–32.4).