Wake Forest

18-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.0%Wake Forest

43.0%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWake Forest -0.7

PROJECTED TOTAL150.8

MODEL MONEYLINEWake Forest -133

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWake Forest 76

Projected Total150.8

Projected ScorePittsburgh 75

Team Comparison

Wake ForestMetricPittsburgh

57.6MMH Power Index50.5

112.4Offensive Efficiency108.4

109.7Defensive Efficiency110.4

2.7Net Efficiency-2.0

7.2Strength of Schedule5.5

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

70.2Tempo65.0

52.8%Effective FG%51.4%

15.5%Turnover Rate17.3%

30.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

36.1%Free Throw Rate31.2%

1.9Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wake Forest HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWake Forest holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–50.5), offensive efficiency (112.4–108.4), defensive efficiency (109.7–110.4), net efficiency (2.7–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.1–30.0).

Final

Wake Forest

69—81

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh by 12 • 67.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wake ForestTEAM STATPittsburgh

23-50FG26-54

46.0%FG%48.0%

6-213PT9-23

29.0%3PT%39.0%

17-23FT20-25

74.0%FT%80.0%

27Rebounds33

7Offensive Rebounds10

11Assists11

15Turnovers11

10Steals10

4Blocks3

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

Wake Forest

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cameron Hildreth	Guard	39	8-14	2-5	5-7	3	2	0	0	23
Hunter Sallis	Guard	39	5-9	3-6	2-4	4	4	4	1	15
Andrew Carr	Forward	39	3-8	0-2	7-9	9	1	0	2	13
Efton Reid III	Forward	26	5-6	1-1	1-1	5	1	1	1	12
Boopie Miller	G	33	2-7	0-1	2-2	3	2	4	0	6
Parker Friedrichsen	G	18	0-6	0-6	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Matthew Marsh	Center	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zach Keller	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	35	11-18	2-6	6-6	8	0	5	0	30
Blake Hinson	Forward	39	6-12	4-6	4-5	3	2	2	2	20
Jaland Lowe	G	39	2-7	0-2	7-8	4	5	0	0	11
Bub Carrington	Guard	38	3-8	1-3	2-4	4	2	2	0	9
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	22	3-6	2-4	1-2	2	1	0	1	9
Federiko Federiko	F	19	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Zack Austin	Forward	8	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.9Possessions67.9

101.6Offensive Efficiency119.3

119.3Defensive Efficiency101.6

-17.7Net Efficiency17.7

52.0%Effective FG%56.5%

56.6%True Shooting %61.5%

21.8%Turnover Rate16.4%

46.0%Free Throw Rate46.3%

42.0%3-Point Rate42.6%

0.73Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Pittsburgh won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 67.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.