
Temple
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.2%Temple
85.8%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -12.0
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -604

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 72
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreSMU 84
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index62.5
112.2Offensive Efficiency118.2
107.4Defensive Efficiency109.6
4.8Net Efficiency8.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule7.0
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
65.9Tempo71.1
51.1%Effective FG%55.7%
13.7%Turnover Rate15.7%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.3%Free Throw Rate31.3%
3.2Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–50.9), offensive efficiency (118.2–112.2), net efficiency (8.6–4.8), strength of schedule (7.0–-2.0).
Temple COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.4–109.6), ball security (13.7–15.7), free throw rate (42.3–31.3).