Texas Southern

12-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

36.0%Texas Southern

64.0%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -5.3

PROJECTED TOTAL144.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -178

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas Southern 70

Projected Total144.4

Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Team Comparison

Texas SouthernMetricGrambling

40.8MMH Power Index41.4

104.2Offensive Efficiency100.7

106.7Defensive Efficiency100.4

-2.5Net Efficiency0.3

-6.3Strength of Schedule-5.7

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

69.8Tempo69.9

50.3%Effective FG%49.2%

18.4%Turnover Rate20.9%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

39.3%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-1.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–40.8), defensive efficiency (100.4–106.7), net efficiency (0.3–-2.5), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.3).

Texas Southern COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.2–100.7), recent form (3.5–-0.4), shooting efficiency (50.3–49.2).

Final

Texas Southern

66—75

Grambling

Grambling by 9 • 64.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas SouthernTEAM STATGrambling

23-54FG23-47

43.0%FG%49.0%

4-223PT8-19

18.0%3PT%42.0%

16-22FT21-31

73.0%FT%68.0%

29Rebounds29

12Offensive Rebounds8

7Assists16

11Turnovers11

5Steals9

1Blocks4

20Fouls16

Player Box Score

Texas Southern

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Deon Stroud	Guard	37	5-11	1-5	5-8	5	1	0	1	16
Kenny Hunter	Forward	30	4-5	0-0	0-2	3	0	1	0	8
Zaire Hayes	G	8	3-5	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Chris Craig	Guard	12	0-1	0-0	4-4	0	1	1	0	4
Jaylen Wysinger	G	24	1-6	0-2	1-2	4	2	1	0	3
PJ Henry	Guard	22	1-4	1-3	0-0	4	1	0	0	3
Xavier Ball	Forward	18	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Grayson Carter	Forward	14	1-6	0-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	2

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jourdan Smith	Guard	36	5-11	3-5	7-7	3	2	1	2	20
Antwan Burnett	G	35	4-10	2-7	4-4	4	0	2	0	14
Jonathan Aku	Forward	29	3-5	0-0	6-8	6	1	3	2	12
Kintavious Dozier	G	31	3-6	1-1	3-8	3	2	1	0	10
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	28	3-7	1-3	1-4	2	7	2	0	8
Mikale Stevenson	G	20	3-5	1-2	0-0	4	3	0	0	7
Zahad Munford	Guard	9	1-2	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

64.1Possessions64.1

103.0Offensive Efficiency117.0

117.0Defensive Efficiency103.0

-14.0Net Efficiency14.0

46.3%Effective FG%57.4%

51.2%True Shooting %60.8%

17.3%Turnover Rate17.0%

40.7%Free Throw Rate66.0%

40.7%3-Point Rate40.4%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.45

Game Summary

Grambling won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 64.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.