Temple logo

Temple

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Temple
76.5%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -326
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 71
Projected Total150.7
Projected ScoreUAB 80

Team Comparison

TempleMetricUAB
50.9MMH Power Index56.9
112.2Offensive Efficiency110.5
107.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
4.8Net Efficiency7.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule0.4
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
65.9Tempo71.7
51.1%Effective FG%48.8%
13.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
42.3%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–50.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.4), net efficiency (7.6–4.8), strength of schedule (0.4–-2.0).
Temple COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.2–110.5), shooting efficiency (51.1–48.8), free throw rate (42.3–36.9).
Final
Temple logo
Temple
69—85
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 16 • 72.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TempleTEAM STATUAB
25-61FG31-63
41.0%FG%49.0%
5-213PT8-19
24.0%3PT%42.0%
14-17FT15-22
82.0%FT%68.0%
37Rebounds36
11Offensive Rebounds9
17Assists19
14Turnovers8
6Steals13
6Blocks5
18Fouls13

Player Box Score

Temple
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Shane DezonieGuard305-100-21-144100011
Jordan RileyG323-100-31-26213007
Jahlil WhiteNot Available223-70-00-15101006
Zion StanfordG72-30-02-23000006
Steve Settle IIIForward272-90-40-03001004
Sam HofmanForward311-31-30-011411003
Matteo PicarelliNot Available90-10-00-00000000
Emmanuel OkpomoForward20-00-00-00000000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Alejandro VasquezGuard3711-165-62-221100029
Eric GainesGuard374-123-64-669530015
Christian ColemanG287-120-01-432100015
Yaxel LendeborgF366-130-12-3164110014
Butta JohnsonG362-70-45-63341009
Javian DavisForward161-10-01-11000003
Daniel OrtizGuard80-20-20-00010000
Tony ToneyGuard20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.3Possessions72.3
95.4Offensive Efficiency117.6
117.6Defensive Efficiency95.4
-22.1Net Efficiency22.1
45.1%Effective FG%55.6%
49.9%True Shooting %57.9%
19.4%Turnover Rate11.0%
27.9%Free Throw Rate34.9%
34.4%3-Point Rate30.2%
1.21Assist / Turnover2.38
Game Summary
UAB won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 72.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.