
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.9%UNLV
37.1%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL150.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -170

Princeton
9-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 76
Projected Total150.6
Projected ScorePrinceton 74
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index43.5
111.0Offensive Efficiency105.1
109.6Defensive Efficiency110.3
1.4Net Efficiency-5.2
2.7Strength of Schedule1.7
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
71.4Tempo65.2
53.7%Effective FG%50.3%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
41.6%Free Throw Rate35.0%
1.0Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–43.5), offensive efficiency (111.0–105.1), defensive efficiency (109.6–110.3), net efficiency (1.4–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHball security (16.9–17.2).