Bradley

21-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.4%Bradley

78.6%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -8.9

PROJECTED TOTAL146.7

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -367

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBradley 69

Projected Total146.7

Projected ScoreCincinnati 78

Team Comparison

BradleyMetricCincinnati

54.4MMH Power Index61.5

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

105.3Defensive Efficiency97.3

5.2Net Efficiency8.0

1.6Strength of Schedule5.1

0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

69.9Tempo69.4

51.2%Effective FG%50.6%

13.9%Turnover Rate17.0%

27.7%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

37.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%

3.6Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–54.4), defensive efficiency (97.3–105.3), net efficiency (8.0–5.2), strength of schedule (5.1–1.6).

Bradley COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), shooting efficiency (51.2–50.6), ball security (13.9–17.0).

Final

Bradley

57—74

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 17 • 68.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BradleyTEAM STATCincinnati

23-61FG28-59

38.0%FG%47.0%

5-233PT10-28

22.0%3PT%36.0%

6-7FT8-15

86.0%FT%53.0%

33Rebounds40

7Offensive Rebounds8

10Assists12

11Turnovers10

5Steals7

2Blocks5

10Fouls10

Player Box Score

Bradley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Malevy Leons	Forward	33	5-11	2-3	4-4	6	0	1	0	16
Connor Hickman	G	32	6-12	2-7	0-0	3	2	1	0	14
Kyle Thomas	F	12	3-6	0-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	8
Christian Davis	Guard	31	3-7	0-3	0-0	8	2	1	1	6
Duke Deen	Guard	30	2-10	1-8	0-0	4	2	0	0	5
Demarion Burch	G	12	2-6	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Darius Hannah	Forward	26	1-8	0-0	0-0	3	3	1	0	2
Cade Hardtke	Guard	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Almar Atlason	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Connor Linke	Forward	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Goanar Biliew	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ahmet Jonovic	C	1	0-0	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	1	0
Sam Hennessy	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jizzle James	G	38	11-17	2-5	1-1	3	1	0	1	25
Dan Skillings Jr.	G	30	7-14	1-4	5-8	5	2	1	1	20
Simas Lukosius	Guard	33	6-16	5-13	0-0	5	3	2	0	17
John Newman III	Forward	31	2-6	1-3	1-2	10	4	2	0	6
Aziz Bandaogo	Forward	22	1-1	0-0	1-4	8	1	0	3	3
Josh Reed	F	21	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Jamille Reynolds	Forward	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Ody Oguama	Forward	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
CJ Anthony	G	2	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Sage Tolentino	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Chase Kirkwood	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Landen Long	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.2Possessions68.2

83.6Offensive Efficiency108.5

108.5Defensive Efficiency83.6

-24.9Net Efficiency24.9

41.8%Effective FG%55.9%

44.3%True Shooting %56.0%

16.1%Turnover Rate14.7%

11.5%Free Throw Rate25.4%

37.7%3-Point Rate47.5%

0.91Assist / Turnover1.20

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 68.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.