
High Point
31-5GAME THAT MATTERSAT
95.4%High Point
4.6%Cleveland State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHigh Point -20.8
PROJECTED TOTAL168.6
MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -2074

Cleveland State
11-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHigh Point 95
Projected Total168.6
Projected ScoreCleveland State 74
Team Comparison
69MMH Power Index37.3
123.8Offensive Efficiency111.6
98.3Defensive Efficiency120.2
25.5Net Efficiency-8.6
-5.8Strength of Schedule-1.7
16.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.6
72.4Tempo71.5
56.6%Effective FG%55.0%
12.8%Turnover Rate18.0%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %28.6%
42.4%Free Throw Rate38.7%
18.5Average Margin-6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
High Point HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–37.3), offensive efficiency (123.8–111.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–120.2), net efficiency (25.5–-8.6).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-5.8).