
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.1%UNLV
72.9%Seton Hall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSeton Hall -8.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINESeton Hall -269

Seton Hall
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 70
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 78
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index57.1
111.0Offensive Efficiency105.8
109.6Defensive Efficiency98.3
1.4Net Efficiency7.5
2.7Strength of Schedule3.5
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency0.6
71.4Tempo66.5
53.7%Effective FG%47.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.7%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %34.8%
41.6%Free Throw Rate35.7%
1.0Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Seton Hall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSeton Hall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–52.8), defensive efficiency (98.3–109.6), net efficiency (7.5–1.4), strength of schedule (3.5–2.7).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.0–105.8), recent form (1.1–0.6), shooting efficiency (53.7–47.9).