Marist

19-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

33.5%Marist

66.5%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -4.1

PROJECTED TOTAL133.6

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -199

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMarist 65

Projected Total133.6

Projected ScoreHarvard 69

Team Comparison

MaristMetricHarvard

51MMH Power Index52.6

104.3Offensive Efficiency108.1

95.6Defensive Efficiency102.9

8.7Net Efficiency5.2

-3.2Strength of Schedule-0.1

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

66.8Tempo64.8

49.9%Effective FG%53.4%

16.8%Turnover Rate17.2%

29.4%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

26.1%Free Throw Rate27.9%

5.8Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–51.0), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.3), strength of schedule (-0.1–-3.2), recent form (8.3–2.9).

Marist COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (95.6–102.9), net efficiency (8.7–5.2), ball security (16.8–17.2).

Final

Marist

66—79

Harvard

Harvard by 13 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MaristTEAM STATHarvard

26-63FG30-48

41.0%FG%63.0%

8-203PT7-17

40.0%3PT%41.0%

6-10FT12-16

60.0%FT%75.0%

27Rebounds31

12Offensive Rebounds5

10Assists12

11Turnovers14

10Steals6

1Blocks3

14Fouls15

Player Box Score

Marist

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josh Pascarelli	G	35	10-16	3-7	1-2	2	3	2	0	24
Jadin Collins-Roberts	G	32	5-12	0-2	1-4	3	3	3	0	11
Elijah Lewis	G	35	3-12	2-4	0-0	1	0	1	1	8
Jaden Daughtry	F	19	3-4	1-1	0-0	1	1	4	0	7
Jackson Price	Forward	20	1-2	0-1	4-4	4	0	0	0	6
Jason Schofield	C	14	2-6	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Parby Kabamba	F	19	1-5	1-3	0-0	6	1	0	0	3
Caleb Mackrey	Guard	6	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Trace Salton	F	10	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Martin Kawa	G	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Travis Roberts	SG	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Robert Hinton	G	33	9-12	1-2	8-10	4	1	1	0	27
Luca Ace-Nasteski	F	21	4-6	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	9
Austin Hunt	G	20	4-6	1-2	0-0	4	2	1	0	9
Thomas Batties III	F	31	3-7	0-2	2-4	4	1	0	2	8
Chandler Pigge	G	27	3-4	0-1	2-2	9	3	1	0	8
Evan Nelson	G	23	3-5	2-3	0-0	0	2	2	0	8
Tey Barbour	G	16	2-4	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Dutch Dowdell	G	13	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	1	1	0	3
Ben Eisendrath	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Xavier Nesbitt	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Leo Byrne	Forward	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Payton Pitts	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Greg Cooper	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

100.5Offensive Efficiency120.2

120.2Defensive Efficiency100.5

-19.8Net Efficiency19.8

47.6%Effective FG%69.8%

48.7%True Shooting %71.0%

16.5%Turnover Rate21.7%

15.9%Free Throw Rate33.3%

31.7%3-Point Rate35.4%

0.91Assist / Turnover0.86

Game Summary

Harvard won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.