Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

55.4%Miami (OH)

44.6%App State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL153.6

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -124

App State

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 78

Projected Total153.6

Projected ScoreApp State 76

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricApp State

60.7MMH Power Index54.2

123.1Offensive Efficiency110.9

103.7Defensive Efficiency101.7

19.4Net Efficiency9.2

-5.6Strength of Schedule-4.2

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0

72.8Tempo64.9

60.6%Effective FG%51.1%

14.2%Turnover Rate15.2%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %34.2%

40.1%Free Throw Rate39.8%

14.1Average Margin6.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–54.2), offensive efficiency (123.1–110.9), net efficiency (19.4–9.2), shooting efficiency (60.6–51.1).

App State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.7–103.7), strength of schedule (-4.2–-5.6), recent form (7.0–5.5).

Final

Miami (OH)

77—63

App State

Miami (OH) by 14 • 71.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATApp State

27-59FG21-53

46.0%FG%40.0%

11-253PT9-32

44.0%3PT%28.0%

12-13FT12-21

92.0%FT%57.0%

35Rebounds34

8Offensive Rebounds10

9Assists11

14Turnovers19

13Steals8

4Blocks5

18Fouls16

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Peter Suder	G	34	6-14	2-4	3-3	6	3	2	1	17
Kam Craft	G	23	6-11	4-7	0-0	0	0	0	0	16
Evan Ipsaro	G	20	3-5	1-2	4-4	4	1	0	0	11
Antwone Woolfolk	F	26	5-6	0-0	0-0	5	0	2	1	10
Eian Elmer	G	21	2-6	1-3	4-4	6	0	1	0	9
Mekhi Cooper	G	29	2-5	2-4	0-0	1	4	4	0	6
Luke Skaljac	G	16	2-4	1-1	1-2	1	0	2	2	6
Jackson Kotecki	F	14	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Brant Byers	G	17	0-5	0-4	0-0	3	1	2	0	0

App State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Myles Tate	Guard	38	8-15	4-7	1-2	4	5	4	0	21
Jackson Threadgill	Guard	36	3-10	1-7	2-4	2	1	1	2	9
CJ Huntley	Forward	34	1-6	1-6	6-6	6	0	1	0	9
Michael Marcus Jr.	F	15	3-3	1-1	2-4	3	0	0	0	9
Luke Wilson	C	24	3-3	0-0	0-2	5	2	1	2	6
Dior Conners	G	13	1-3	1-3	1-3	0	1	0	0	4
Anthony Alston	Guard	15	1-4	1-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	3
Jamil Muttilib	G	16	1-8	0-5	0-0	7	2	0	0	2
Jalil Beaubrun	Forward	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Jason Clarke Jr.	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6

107.5Offensive Efficiency88.0

88.0Defensive Efficiency107.5

19.6Net Efficiency-19.6

55.1%Effective FG%48.1%

59.1%True Shooting %50.0%

19.7%Turnover Rate26.4%

22.0%Free Throw Rate39.6%

42.4%3-Point Rate60.4%

0.64Assist / Turnover0.58

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.