
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
67.4%Columbia
32.6%Loyola Maryland
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL152.4
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -207

Loyola Maryland
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 78
Projected Total152.4
Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 74
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index40.8
112.4Offensive Efficiency108.1
105.2Defensive Efficiency110.7
7.2Net Efficiency-2.6
-1.7Strength of Schedule-5.0
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1
68.2Tempo69.6
54.4%Effective FG%51.2%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.7%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %29.4%
28.8%Free Throw Rate31.0%
5.0Average Margin-1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–40.8), offensive efficiency (112.4–108.1), defensive efficiency (105.2–110.7), net efficiency (7.2–-2.6).
Loyola Maryland COUNTERS WITHball security (15.7–19.1), free throw rate (31.0–28.8).