
Quinnipiac
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.8%Quinnipiac
89.2%Yale
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -13.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.5
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -826

Yale
23-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 67
Projected Total148.5
Projected ScoreYale 81
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index65.4
106.8Offensive Efficiency121.4
102.1Defensive Efficiency105.8
4.7Net Efficiency15.6
-2.3Strength of Schedule1.6
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9
70.5Tempo64.5
48.9%Effective FG%56.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate13.9%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
34.1%Free Throw Rate34.4%
3.4Average Margin10.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Yale HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–51.0), offensive efficiency (121.4–106.8), net efficiency (15.6–4.7), strength of schedule (1.6–-2.3).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–105.8), offensive rebounding (34.1–33.3).