Quinnipiac logo

Quinnipiac

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.8%Quinnipiac
89.2%Yale
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -13.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.5
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -826
Yale logo

Yale

23-7
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 67
Projected Total148.5
Projected ScoreYale 81

Team Comparison

51MMH Power Index65.4
106.8Offensive Efficiency121.4
102.1Defensive Efficiency105.8
4.7Net Efficiency15.6
-2.3Strength of Schedule1.6
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9
70.5Tempo64.5
48.9%Effective FG%56.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate13.9%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
34.1%Free Throw Rate34.4%
3.4Average Margin10.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–51.0), offensive efficiency (121.4–106.8), net efficiency (15.6–4.7), strength of schedule (1.6–-2.3).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–105.8), offensive rebounding (34.1–33.3).
Final
Quinnipiac logo
Quinnipiac
62—88
Yale logo
Yale
Yale by 26 • 72.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATYale
19-60FG30-65
32.0%FG%46.0%
7-323PT7-20
22.0%3PT%35.0%
17-18FT21-27
94.0%FT%78.0%
27Rebounds50
10Offensive Rebounds21
10Assists19
14Turnovers15
10Steals7
7Blocks4
24Fouls16

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amarri MonroeF309-221-94-421400023
Alexis ReyesForward262-52-36-631100012
Paul OtienoF241-51-22-28014005
Savion LewisGuard202-30-01-21610005
Jaden ZimmermanG111-31-22-20010005
Ryan MabreyG241-91-70-01010003
Khaden BennettG141-31-20-03100003
Grant RandallF191-60-40-02001002
Doug YoungG131-30-20-02110002
Quinn GuthGuard30-10-12-20000002
Spence WeweF80-00-00-00001000
Richie SpringsForward80-00-00-01001000
Yale
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John PoulakidasGuard308-183-110-051100019
Isaac CeliscarF256-80-06-782100018
Bez MbengGuard273-71-310-1258110017
Nick TownsendF285-112-22-272100014
Casey SimmonsG173-80-00-03110006
Jack MolloyForward72-30-01-11010005
Yassine GharramG211-31-10-15211003
Samson AletanC161-10-00-03201002
Riley FoxF61-30-20-02000002
Jordan BrathwaiteG60-00-01-21001001
Teo RiceGuard30-00-01-21000001
Trevor MullinG70-20-10-00000000
Devon ArlingtonG40-10-00-01100000
Jeannot BasimaG30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.2Possessions72.2
85.9Offensive Efficiency121.9
121.9Defensive Efficiency85.9
-36.0Net Efficiency36.0
37.5%Effective FG%51.5%
45.2%True Shooting %56.5%
19.3%Turnover Rate20.9%
30.0%Free Throw Rate41.5%
53.3%3-Point Rate30.8%
0.71Assist / Turnover1.27
Game Summary
Yale won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 72.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.