Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.6%Lipscomb

69.4%Duquesne

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuquesne -6.1

PROJECTED TOTAL154.6

MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -227

Duquesne

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 74

Projected Total154.6

Projected ScoreDuquesne 80

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricDuquesne

47.9MMH Power Index50.7

111.3Offensive Efficiency110.6

107.6Defensive Efficiency106.2

3.7Net Efficiency4.4

-2.5Strength of Schedule0.6

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

68.8Tempo70.8

54.8%Effective FG%53.4%

16.0%Turnover Rate17.7%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

26.5%Free Throw Rate38.2%

2.5Average Margin3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duquesne HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.7–47.9), defensive efficiency (106.2–107.6), net efficiency (4.4–3.7), strength of schedule (0.6–-2.5).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.3–110.6), recent form (-1.0–-5.9), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.4).

Final

Lipscomb

77—72

Duquesne

Lipscomb by 5 • 75.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATDuquesne

25-48FG28-62

52.0%FG%45.0%

9-213PT6-20

43.0%3PT%30.0%

18-26FT10-19

69.0%FT%53.0%

32Rebounds33

3Offensive Rebounds9

16Assists10

17Turnovers14

3Steals6

2Blocks4

18Fouls22

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Ognacevic	F	35	10-18	2-6	8-11	10	0	1	0	30
Will Pruitt	Guard	36	4-7	0-1	7-9	6	3	0	0	15
Gyasi Powell	Guard	37	4-5	2-2	2-2	2	3	0	0	12
Charlie Williams	C	17	3-4	3-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	9
Joe Anderson	Guard	35	2-9	1-5	0-0	6	8	1	1	5
Grant Asman	F	17	1-3	0-1	1-2	2	1	1	1	3
Miles White	G	12	1-2	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Logan Suber	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	1	0	0	0
Rylan Houck	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ross Candelino	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Duquesne

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tre Dinkins	G	20	6-10	3-6	1-2	1	2	1	0	16
Maximus Edwards	G	31	5-13	1-5	3-5	9	1	2	1	14
Jahsean Corbett	Guard	32	5-9	0-0	2-6	6	1	0	0	12
Jake DiMichele	G	21	4-8	1-3	0-1	0	1	0	0	9
Eli Wilborn	F	10	4-5	0-0	0-1	3	0	1	1	8
Kareem Rozier	G	27	2-9	0-2	2-2	2	2	0	0	6
Matúš Hronský	F	10	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Jakub Necas	F	28	0-3	0-1	2-2	7	2	0	1	2
David Dixon	F	13	1-3	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Cam Crawford	G	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.2Possessions75.2

102.4Offensive Efficiency95.7

95.7Defensive Efficiency102.4

6.6Net Efficiency-6.6

61.5%Effective FG%50.0%

63.8%True Shooting %50.7%

22.9%Turnover Rate18.4%

54.2%Free Throw Rate30.6%

43.8%3-Point Rate32.3%

0.94Assist / Turnover0.71

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 75.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.