UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.7%UT Rio Grande Valley

85.3%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -12.0

PROJECTED TOTAL144.9

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -580

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 66

Projected Total144.9

Projected ScoreNebraska 78

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricNebraska

55.8MMH Power Index67

112.6Offensive Efficiency114.4

103.1Defensive Efficiency98.3

9.5Net Efficiency16.1

-1.9Strength of Schedule6.1

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

67.4Tempo67.3

55.7%Effective FG%55.6%

17.9%Turnover Rate14.4%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.6%Free Throw Rate26.9%

6.4Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–55.8), offensive efficiency (114.4–112.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.1), net efficiency (16.1–9.5).

UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHrecent form (12.3–6.8), shooting efficiency (55.7–55.6), offensive rebounding (29.2–26.3).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

67—87

Nebraska

Nebraska by 20 • 76.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATNebraska

24-62FG28-57

39.0%FG%49.0%

13-413PT6-19

32.0%3PT%32.0%

6-9FT25-35

67.0%FT%71.0%

32Rebounds42

9Offensive Rebounds11

11Assists11

20Turnovers13

4Steals9

—Blocks2

27Fouls15

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
K.T. Raimey	Guard	28	5-13	2-8	2-2	1	0	1	14
Cliff Davis	G	30	4-12	4-10	0-0	7	0	0	12
DK Thorn	Guard	26	4-10	3-7	0-0	3	1	0	11
Tommy Gankhuyag	Forward	19	4-5	3-4	0-1	3	1	0	11
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	16	2-4	1-2	2-4	1	2	0	7
Trey Miller	G	22	2-6	0-3	2-2	2	1	0	6
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	29	2-7	0-4	0-0	7	6	2	4
Jaylen Washington	G	11	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	2
Marshal Destremau	F	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0
Kwo Agwa	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0
Isaiah Barganier	F	3	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brice Williams	Guard	28	8-18	1-6	10-11	5	0	0	0	27
Rollie Worster	Guard	30	6-7	1-1	5-9	9	3	4	1	18
Connor Essegian	G	23	4-5	3-4	2-2	4	2	1	0	13
Andrew Morgan	Forward	20	3-6	0-0	4-6	5	0	0	0	10
Juwan Gary	Forward	25	2-8	1-4	4-4	4	0	1	0	9
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	27	3-4	0-0	0-0	6	2	2	0	6
Gavin Griffiths	G	14	2-5	0-3	0-0	3	0	0	1	4
Sam Hoiberg	G	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ahron Ulis	Guard	11	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	0
Braxton Meah	Center	10	0-2	0-0	0-3	4	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.4Possessions76.4

87.7Offensive Efficiency113.9

113.9Defensive Efficiency87.7

-26.2Net Efficiency26.2

49.2%Effective FG%54.4%

50.5%True Shooting %59.1%

25.9%Turnover Rate17.2%

14.5%Free Throw Rate61.4%

66.1%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.55Assist / Turnover0.85

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 76.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.