
Alabama State
10-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.4%Alabama State
89.6%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -14.0
PROJECTED TOTAL156.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -862

UNLV
18-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama State 71
Projected Total156.9
Projected ScoreUNLV 85
Team Comparison
38MMH Power Index52.8
101.7Offensive Efficiency111.0
107.4Defensive Efficiency109.6
-5.7Net Efficiency1.4
-6.2Strength of Schedule2.7
0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
71.9Tempo71.4
48.2%Effective FG%53.7%
18.2%Turnover Rate17.2%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.8%Free Throw Rate41.6%
-4.1Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–38.0), offensive efficiency (111.0–101.7), net efficiency (1.4–-5.7), strength of schedule (2.7–-6.2).
Alabama State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.4–109.6), offensive rebounding (32.6–30.8).