Florida A&M

14-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.4%Florida A&M

95.6%SMU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSMU -20.5

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINESMU -2173

SMU

20-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 68

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreSMU 88

Team Comparison

Florida A&MMetricSMU

39.4MMH Power Index62.5

98.7Offensive Efficiency118.2

105.6Defensive Efficiency109.6

-6.9Net Efficiency8.6

-3.2Strength of Schedule7.0

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3

70.6Tempo71.1

49.2%Effective FG%55.7%

21.6%Turnover Rate15.7%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

38.0%Free Throw Rate31.3%

-4.8Average Margin6.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–39.4), offensive efficiency (118.2–98.7), net efficiency (8.6–-6.9), strength of schedule (7.0–-3.2).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–109.6), recent form (4.5–-1.3), free throw rate (38.0–31.3).

Final

Florida A&M

73—102

SMU

SMU by 29 • 78.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATSMU

22-61FG35-66

36.0%FG%53.0%

9-283PT10-24

32.0%3PT%42.0%

20-26FT22-27

77.0%FT%81.0%

34Rebounds45

10Offensive Rebounds12

16Assists23

15Turnovers11

6Steals10

4Blocks7

20Fouls21

Player Box Score

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sterling Young	G	27	5-17	3-8	2-2	0	3	0	0	15
Jordan Chatman	G	24	4-9	3-7	2-2	5	0	0	1	13
Milton Matthews III	G	24	2-5	2-4	4-5	2	2	1	0	10
Saiyd Burnside	Forward	22	3-4	0-0	1-3	3	2	1	0	7
Kaleb Washington	F	28	1-10	0-2	4-4	4	0	0	1	6
Shaqir O'Neal	F	13	2-4	0-0	2-4	5	1	1	0	6
Tyler Shirley	F	28	2-5	0-2	1-1	6	3	1	0	5
Jocobi Hendricks	Guard	4	1-2	1-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	5
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	13	1-1	0-0	0-1	0	0	1	2	2
Trey Lewis	Guard	7	0-2	0-2	2-2	1	2	1	0	2
Miles Hall	Guard	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	2
Jamine Charles	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Roderick Coffee III	F	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Boopie Miller	G	31	7-13	2-4	4-5	9	9	3	0	20
Yohan Traore	F	25	4-8	1-4	10-12	10	1	0	2	19
Chuck Harris	Guard	24	5-10	4-6	1-1	5	2	0	0	15
B.J. Edwards	G	26	5-7	1-2	2-3	7	6	3	0	13
Keon Ambrose-Hylton	Forward	21	5-7	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	2	10
Tibet Gorener	Forward	17	3-6	2-4	0-0	3	0	0	0	8
Kario Oquendo	Guard	27	1-6	0-2	5-6	2	2	3	2	7
Jerrell Colbert	F	11	3-5	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	1	6
AJ George	G	16	2-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Trey Utter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jackson Young	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.1Possessions78.1

93.5Offensive Efficiency130.6

130.6Defensive Efficiency93.5

-37.1Net Efficiency37.1

43.4%Effective FG%60.6%

49.8%True Shooting %64.7%

19.1%Turnover Rate14.1%

42.6%Free Throw Rate40.9%

45.9%3-Point Rate36.4%

1.07Assist / Turnover2.09

Game Summary

SMU won by 29 points. The game played at approximately 78.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.