
Western Carolina
15-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.0%Western Carolina
59.0%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL166.8
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -144

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWestern Carolina 82
Projected Total166.8
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Team Comparison
53MMH Power Index51.7
112.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
111.0Defensive Efficiency117.0
1.6Net Efficiency1.4
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.1
13.1Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
69.7Tempo71.4
51.1%Effective FG%56.6%
16.4%Turnover Rate14.8%
36.1%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
30.8%Free Throw Rate37.6%
1.1Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Western Carolina HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWestern Carolina holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.0–51.7), defensive efficiency (111.0–117.0), net efficiency (1.6–1.4), recent form (13.1–1.5).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–112.6), strength of schedule (0.1–-0.9), shooting efficiency (56.6–51.1).