Saint Francis

7-24

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

2.8%Saint Francis

97.2%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -24.3

PROJECTED TOTAL144.8

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -3471

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSaint Francis 60

Projected Total144.8

Projected ScoreClemson 85

Team Comparison

Saint FrancisMetricClemson

32.7MMH Power Index59.9

101.2Offensive Efficiency112.6

114.7Defensive Efficiency101.4

-13.5Net Efficiency11.2

-2.3Strength of Schedule4.6

-10.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

70.6Tempo63.6

49.8%Effective FG%53.0%

18.3%Turnover Rate14.0%

28.4%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

31.2%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-9.5Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–32.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–101.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–114.7), net efficiency (11.2–-13.5).

Saint Francis COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (28.4–27.0).

Final

Saint Francis

62—88

Clemson

Clemson by 26 • 71.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Saint FrancisTEAM STATClemson

22-56FG33-56

39.0%FG%59.0%

8-203PT12-27

40.0%3PT%44.0%

10-14FT10-17

71.0%FT%59.0%

24Rebounds36

7Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists19

16Turnovers16

10Steals12

—Blocks4

14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Saint Francis

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Ace Talbert	G	31	6-15	3-5	2-3	4	1	1	17
Jeremy Clayville	G	18	4-8	3-5	0-0	3	1	1	11
Bobby Rosenberger III	Guard	24	3-7	1-3	3-3	2	1	1	10
Valentino Pinedo	F	29	3-7	0-0	2-2	5	0	2	8
Miles Webb	F	7	2-3	0-1	1-2	2	0	0	5
Aidan Harris	Forward	11	1-2	0-1	2-2	1	1	1	4
Daemar Kelly	G	14	1-2	1-2	0-2	0	1	1	3
Riley Parker	G	27	1-3	0-1	0-0	4	2	2	2
Juan Cranford Jr.	G	21	1-7	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	2
Chris Moncrief	G	12	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0
Victor Payne	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	34	6-9	2-3	2-3	4	6	4	0	16
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	30	6-11	1-3	3-4	13	4	2	1	16
Chase Hunter	Guard	28	5-10	2-6	1-2	0	2	1	1	13
Chauncey Wiggins	F	22	4-6	2-4	1-2	1	2	0	0	11
Viktor Lakhin	Center	20	4-4	0-0	0-0	4	1	1	2	8
Jake Heidbreder	G	19	2-4	2-4	2-2	0	0	0	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	14	3-6	2-5	0-2	0	1	2	0	8
Del Jones	G	12	2-4	0-1	1-2	2	2	1	0	5
Asa Thomas	G	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Myles Foster	Forward	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	0
Christian Reeves	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Jackson Roberts	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Nauseef	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Andrew Latiff	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Matt Kelly	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.9Possessions71.9

86.2Offensive Efficiency122.4

122.4Defensive Efficiency86.2

-36.2Net Efficiency36.2

46.4%Effective FG%69.6%

49.5%True Shooting %68.7%

22.3%Turnover Rate22.2%

25.0%Free Throw Rate30.4%

35.7%3-Point Rate48.2%

0.56Assist / Turnover1.19

Game Summary

Clemson won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 71.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.