
UL Monroe
4-28GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.9%UL Monroe
88.1%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -14.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.7
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -740

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUL Monroe 70
Projected Total154.7
Projected ScoreTulane 84
Team Comparison
30.9MMH Power Index44.3
101.1Offensive Efficiency105.3
117.1Defensive Efficiency109.9
-16.0Net Efficiency-4.6
-1.0Strength of Schedule2.7
-16.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
71.7Tempo68.7
48.1%Effective FG%49.6%
16.9%Turnover Rate15.6%
25.3%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
40.6%Free Throw Rate44.8%
-11.5Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulane HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulane holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.3–30.9), offensive efficiency (105.3–101.1), defensive efficiency (109.9–117.1), net efficiency (-4.6–-16.0).
UL Monroe COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (25.3–22.8).