
Princeton
9-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.2%Princeton
78.8%Duquesne
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuquesne -9.9
PROJECTED TOTAL148.2
MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -372

Duquesne
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrinceton 69
Projected Total148.2
Projected ScoreDuquesne 79
Team Comparison
43.5MMH Power Index50.7
105.1Offensive Efficiency110.6
110.3Defensive Efficiency106.2
-5.2Net Efficiency4.4
1.7Strength of Schedule0.6
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9
65.2Tempo70.8
50.3%Effective FG%53.4%
16.9%Turnover Rate17.7%
27.5%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
35.0%Free Throw Rate38.2%
-3.4Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Duquesne HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuquesne holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.7–43.5), offensive efficiency (110.6–105.1), defensive efficiency (106.2–110.3), net efficiency (4.4–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.6), ball security (16.9–17.7).