
UC Irvine
23-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.8%UC Irvine
39.2%Loyola Marymount
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL147.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -155

Loyola Marymount
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUC Irvine 75
Projected Total147.3
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 72
Team Comparison
58.4MMH Power Index49.9
106.9Offensive Efficiency107.0
95.0Defensive Efficiency103.8
11.9Net Efficiency3.2
-1.0Strength of Schedule0.5
10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.2
72.3Tempo69.4
50.7%Effective FG%52.8%
17.6%Turnover Rate17.2%
33.1%Offensive Rebound %27.3%
36.5%Free Throw Rate32.1%
8.6Average Margin2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–49.9), defensive efficiency (95.0–103.8), net efficiency (11.9–3.2), recent form (10.0–-1.2).
Loyola Marymount COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.0–106.9), strength of schedule (0.5–-1.0), shooting efficiency (52.8–50.7).