Wright State logo

Wright State

23-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.7%Wright State
71.3%Miami (OH)
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -8.1
PROJECTED TOTAL164.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -248
Miami (OH) logo

Miami (OH)

32-2
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWright State 78
Projected Total164.0
Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 86

Team Comparison

57.1MMH Power Index60.7
116.4Offensive Efficiency123.1
106.5Defensive Efficiency103.7
9.9Net Efficiency19.4
-2.0Strength of Schedule-5.6
7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5
69.2Tempo72.8
55.2%Effective FG%60.6%
16.1%Turnover Rate14.2%
33.9%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
38.3%Free Throw Rate40.1%
6.8Average Margin14.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–57.1), offensive efficiency (123.1–116.4), defensive efficiency (103.7–106.5), net efficiency (19.4–9.9).
Wright State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-5.6), recent form (7.0–5.5), offensive rebounding (33.9–26.3).
Final
Wright State logo
Wright State
81—68
Miami (OH) logo
Miami (OH)
Wright State by 13 • 71.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wright StateTEAM STATMiami (OH)
31-56FG27-64
55.0%FG%42.0%
7-213PT6-22
33.0%3PT%27.0%
12-18FT8-13
67.0%FT%62.0%
37Rebounds34
7Offensive Rebounds11
16Assists10
14Turnovers12
9Steals9
7Blocks4
16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Wright State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Brandon NoelF3710-150-27-9161330027
Alex HuibregtseG3611-164-60-061300026
Jack Doumbia Jr.F143-40-12-23202008
Andrew WelageGuard272-72-70-13101006
Keaton NorrisG331-10-03-42720005
Logan WoodsG252-61-40-02310005
Michael ImariagbeF102-40-00-01001004
Drey CarterGuard90-20-00-02100000
Solomon CallaghanG90-10-10-20000000
Miami (OH)
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kam CraftG3110-193-50-030000023
Eian ElmerG275-112-70-153330012
Antwone WoolfolkF284-70-00-110110008
Mekhi CooperG222-60-13-40120007
Luke SkaljacG132-40-13-44020007
Brant ByersG192-51-20-13000005
Peter SuderG352-70-30-05400004
Jackson KoteckiF100-20-22-21001002
Evan IpsaroG150-30-10-02110000

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4
113.4Offensive Efficiency95.2
95.2Defensive Efficiency113.4
18.2Net Efficiency-18.2
61.6%Effective FG%46.9%
62.7%True Shooting %48.5%
19.6%Turnover Rate16.9%
32.1%Free Throw Rate20.3%
37.5%3-Point Rate34.4%
1.14Assist / Turnover0.83
Game Summary
Wright State won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.