
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%Colgate
56.3%Drexel
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDrexel -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL143.4
MODEL MONEYLINEDrexel -129

Drexel
17-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 70
Projected Total143.4
Projected ScoreDrexel 73
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index46.5
111.7Offensive Efficiency103.6
109.0Defensive Efficiency102.4
2.7Net Efficiency1.2
-2.0Strength of Schedule-0.4
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
68.4Tempo65.7
54.5%Effective FG%51.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate19.1%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
30.0%Free Throw Rate32.3%
1.8Average Margin0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (111.7–103.6), net efficiency (2.7–1.2), recent form (-0.3–-4.7).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–109.0), strength of schedule (-0.4–-2.0), offensive rebounding (30.7–26.9).