Sam Houston

22-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

68.4%Sam Houston

31.6%Tarleton State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSam Houston -3.8

PROJECTED TOTAL155.3

MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -216

Tarleton State

14-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSam Houston 80

Projected Total155.3

Projected ScoreTarleton State 76

Team Comparison

Sam HoustonMetricTarleton State

56.1MMH Power Index44.6

115.5Offensive Efficiency103.2

105.5Defensive Efficiency101.6

10.0Net Efficiency1.6

-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.3

3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7

71.2Tempo72.2

53.2%Effective FG%49.0%

16.6%Turnover Rate19.9%

37.4%Offensive Rebound %31.8%

34.8%Free Throw Rate42.8%

7.1Average Margin1.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.6), offensive efficiency (115.5–103.2), net efficiency (10.0–1.6), strength of schedule (-2.2–-2.3).

Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.6–105.5), free throw rate (42.8–34.8).

Final

Sam Houston

91—62

Tarleton State

Sam Houston by 29 • 75.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Sam HoustonTEAM STATTarleton State

30-63FG25-57

48.0%FG%44.0%

14-263PT4-12

54.0%3PT%33.0%

17-27FT8-19

63.0%FT%42.0%

47Rebounds31

19Offensive Rebounds12

20Assists13

19Turnovers22

11Steals13

5Blocks3

22Fouls20

Player Box Score

Sam Houston

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dorian Finister	G	31	6-13	3-5	0-0	11	0	1	1	15
Lamar Wilkerson	G	21	5-10	3-4	2-4	1	3	0	0	15
Kian Scroggins	Forward	19	4-6	0-1	6-9	8	0	0	0	14
Cameron Huefner	Forward	20	2-6	2-3	5-5	2	1	1	0	11
Marcus Boykin	Guard	24	3-4	1-1	1-4	2	6	4	0	8
Brennen Burns	Guard	25	2-4	1-1	2-2	2	9	1	0	7
Josiah Hammons	G	14	2-7	1-6	1-1	1	0	1	0	6
Erik Taylor	G	9	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Kalifa Sakho	F	19	2-6	0-0	0-0	3	0	3	3	4
Jackson Rogers	G	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Wade Neyland	Guard	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jaxson Ford	F	12	0-1	0-0	0-2	6	0	0	1	0

Tarleton State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bubu Benjamin	G	37	7-10	2-4	1-4	10	3	2	0	17
Chris Mpaka	F	22	6-9	0-0	3-9	7	1	2	2	15
Matt Krass	Guard	26	4-8	2-4	0-0	1	1	2	0	10
Izzy Miles	G	30	2-9	0-1	2-2	0	1	2	1	6
Jordan Mizell	G	33	2-10	0-0	1-2	6	6	1	0	5
Joseph Martinez	G	26	2-5	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Nick Krass	G	16	1-4	0-2	1-2	0	0	2	0	3
Caleb Evans	Guard	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Roy Marom	G	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.9Possessions75.9

119.9Offensive Efficiency81.7

81.7Defensive Efficiency119.9

38.2Net Efficiency-38.2

58.7%Effective FG%47.4%

60.0%True Shooting %47.0%

25.1%Turnover Rate28.9%

42.9%Free Throw Rate33.3%

41.3%3-Point Rate21.1%

1.05Assist / Turnover0.59

Game Summary

Sam Houston won by 29 points. The game played at approximately 75.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.