App State

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.0%App State

84.0%Wisconsin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWisconsin -10.6

PROJECTED TOTAL149.9

MODEL MONEYLINEWisconsin -525

Wisconsin

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreApp State 70

Projected Total149.9

Projected ScoreWisconsin 80

Team Comparison

App StateMetricWisconsin

54.2MMH Power Index64.5

110.9Offensive Efficiency118.6

101.7Defensive Efficiency108.8

9.2Net Efficiency9.8

-4.2Strength of Schedule6.7

7.0Last 10 Net Efficiency5.6

64.9Tempo69.9

51.1%Effective FG%54.6%

15.2%Turnover Rate12.8%

34.2%Offensive Rebound %28.7%

39.8%Free Throw Rate32.5%

6.0Average Margin6.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wisconsin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWisconsin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–54.2), offensive efficiency (118.6–110.9), net efficiency (9.8–9.2), strength of schedule (6.7–-4.2).

App State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.7–108.8), recent form (7.0–5.6), offensive rebounding (34.2–28.7).

Final

App State

56—87

Wisconsin

Wisconsin by 31 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

App StateTEAM STATWisconsin

21-56FG33-70

38.0%FG%47.0%

7-243PT8-28

29.0%3PT%29.0%

7-13FT13-16

54.0%FT%81.0%

36Rebounds43

11Offensive Rebounds14

11Assists17

18Turnovers6

2Steals14

2Blocks1

19Fouls18

Player Box Score

App State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
CJ Huntley	Forward	30	4-7	3-5	2-2	6	0	0	1	13
Jackson Threadgill	Guard	28	5-8	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	11
Jalil Beaubrun	Forward	23	4-8	0-2	1-3	5	0	1	0	9
Myles Tate	Guard	32	2-10	1-5	0-1	6	5	1	0	5
Michael Marcus Jr.	F	11	2-3	0-0	1-1	3	0	0	0	5
Jason Clarke Jr.	G	5	1-2	1-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	5
Anthony Alston	Guard	19	1-4	1-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	3
Luke Wilson	C	16	1-4	0-0	1-4	1	0	0	0	3
Alonzo Dodd	G	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Jamil Muttilib	G	24	0-7	0-5	0-0	5	1	0	1	0
Dior Conners	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Wisconsin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
John Tonje	Guard	30	8-14	1-5	0-0	7	5	2	0	17
Steve Crowl	Forward	28	7-12	1-3	2-2	1	4	2	0	17
Max Klesmit	Guard	28	5-11	2-6	3-3	1	4	5	0	15
Nolan Winter	F	23	3-5	1-2	3-5	8	0	2	0	10
Xavier Amos	F	12	2-8	2-4	4-4	6	0	1	0	10
John Blackwell	G	24	4-10	0-2	0-1	4	1	0	0	8
Kamari McGee	Guard	22	2-3	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	4
Markus Ilver	Forward	4	1-4	0-2	1-1	3	0	1	1	3
Jack Robison	F	1	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Carter Gilmore	Forward	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Jack Janicki	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Daniel Freitag	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Riccardo Greppi	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Chris Hodges	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Aidan Konop	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Isaac Gard	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Camren Hunter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4

80.7Offensive Efficiency125.4

125.4Defensive Efficiency80.7

-44.7Net Efficiency44.7

43.8%Effective FG%52.9%

45.0%True Shooting %56.1%

26.0%Turnover Rate8.6%

23.2%Free Throw Rate22.9%

42.9%3-Point Rate40.0%

0.61Assist / Turnover2.83

Game Summary

Wisconsin won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.