SE Louisiana logo

SE Louisiana

9-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.3%SE Louisiana
92.7%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -16.9
PROJECTED TOTAL141.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -1270
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSE Louisiana 62
Projected Total141.8
Projected ScoreUAB 79

Team Comparison

38.7MMH Power Index56.9
98.4Offensive Efficiency110.5
106.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
-8.0Net Efficiency7.6
0.2Strength of Schedule0.4
-11.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
63.9Tempo71.7
47.0%Effective FG%48.8%
18.5%Turnover Rate12.4%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
38.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-5.1Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–38.7), offensive efficiency (110.5–98.4), defensive efficiency (102.9–106.4), net efficiency (7.6–-8.0).
SE Louisiana COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (38.9–36.9).
Final
SE Louisiana logo
SE Louisiana
72—82
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 10 • 71.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SE LouisianaTEAM STATUAB
28-62FG31-62
45.0%FG%50.0%
7-213PT6-18
33.0%3PT%33.0%
9-16FT14-22
56.0%FT%64.0%
34Rebounds40
11Offensive Rebounds13
14Assists16
13Turnovers11
7Steals6
2Blocks3
19Fouls16

Player Box Score

SE Louisiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jakevion BuckleyG306-121-43-507100016
Jeremy ElyzeeF327-130-10-1100210014
Sam Hines Jr.Guard354-91-22-384210011
Kam BurtonG123-92-71-21000009
Carlos PaezGuard163-52-30-02100008
Brody RowburyF243-60-01-15010007
Thomas TutF271-30-11-23000003
Kyle EdisonG111-31-20-00210003
CJ BookerPG130-20-11-23000001
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF369-102-22-285120022
Christian ColemanG274-100-03-4123110011
Tony ToneyGuard235-91-30-031100011
Greg GordonG195-110-20-351000010
Alejandro VasquezGuard223-60-22-20010008
Ja'Borri McGheeG232-31-12-35320007
Bradley EzewiroForward131-20-05-83000007
Butta JohnsonG202-72-50-00100006
Tyren MooreG170-40-30-03200000

Advanced Game Stats

71.1Possessions71.1
101.3Offensive Efficiency115.3
115.3Defensive Efficiency101.3
-14.1Net Efficiency14.1
50.8%Effective FG%54.8%
51.7%True Shooting %56.6%
18.2%Turnover Rate15.6%
25.8%Free Throw Rate35.5%
33.9%3-Point Rate29.0%
1.08Assist / Turnover1.45
Game Summary
UAB won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 71.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.