Norfolk State

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.3%Norfolk State

83.7%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -10.9

PROJECTED TOTAL158.8

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -513

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorfolk State 74

Projected Total158.8

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 85

Team Comparison

Norfolk StateMetricWilliam & Mary

43.7MMH Power Index53.8

108.9Offensive Efficiency112.5

105.2Defensive Efficiency105.2

3.7Net Efficiency7.3

-9.4Strength of Schedule-1.5

0.6Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

70.1Tempo73.9

51.9%Effective FG%55.3%

17.6%Turnover Rate16.4%

34.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

44.6%Free Throw Rate45.3%

2.6Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–43.7), offensive efficiency (112.5–108.9), net efficiency (7.3–3.7), strength of schedule (-1.5–-9.4).

Norfolk State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (34.0–26.7).

Final

Norfolk State

73—84

William & Mary

William & Mary by 11 • 72.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Norfolk StateTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

27-60FG30-67

45.0%FG%45.0%

1-143PT16-46

7.0%3PT%35.0%

18-23FT8-13

78.0%FT%62.0%

33Rebounds40

11Offensive Rebounds16

12Assists22

13Turnovers14

9Steals7

3Blocks4

16Fouls20

Player Box Score

Norfolk State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brian Moore Jr.	G	34	12-19	0-2	7-7	6	2	0	0	31
Jalen Myers	F	28	5-8	0-1	7-8	6	1	1	1	17
Christian Ings	Guard	22	3-9	0-1	3-7	3	2	3	0	9
Terrance Jones	G	23	2-4	1-2	1-1	2	2	2	0	6
Sin'Cere McMahon	Not Available	22	2-8	0-6	0-0	0	2	0	0	4
Jaylani Darden	Guard	16	2-4	0-0	0-0	6	2	0	0	4
Dramane Camara	G	8	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Tyrel Bladen	Forward	19	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Kuluel Mading	C	14	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2	0
Jordan Leaks	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Melo Baines	F	5	0-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kyle Frazier	G	19	5-8	5-8	3-3	2	3	1	0	18
Kyle Pulliam	G	17	3-6	2-5	1-3	3	0	1	1	9
Finn Lally	F	14	3-4	2-3	1-2	4	2	1	2	9
Keller Boothby	Forward	29	3-8	2-7	0-0	6	3	1	0	8
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	28	3-13	2-11	0-0	9	2	0	0	8
Matteus Case	Guard	24	3-7	0-2	1-2	2	2	1	0	7
Noah Collier	F	14	3-5	0-0	1-1	4	1	1	0	7
Malachi Ndur	Forward	17	2-9	1-6	0-0	1	3	0	0	5
Chase Lowe	G	16	2-2	0-0	1-2	3	2	1	1	5
Miles Hicks	G	13	2-3	1-2	0-0	3	2	0	0	5
Isaiah Mbeng	G	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

72.1Possessions72.1

101.2Offensive Efficiency116.5

116.5Defensive Efficiency101.2

-15.3Net Efficiency15.3

45.8%Effective FG%56.7%

51.5%True Shooting %57.4%

17.8%Turnover Rate19.7%

38.3%Free Throw Rate19.4%

23.3%3-Point Rate68.7%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 72.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.