
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.9%Drexel
73.1%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -6.8
PROJECTED TOTAL139.6
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -272

Temple
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 66
Projected Total139.6
Projected ScoreTemple 73
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index50.9
103.6Offensive Efficiency112.2
102.4Defensive Efficiency107.4
1.2Net Efficiency4.8
-0.4Strength of Schedule-2.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
65.7Tempo65.9
51.3%Effective FG%51.1%
19.1%Turnover Rate13.7%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
32.3%Free Throw Rate42.3%
0.8Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Temple HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–46.5), offensive efficiency (112.2–103.6), net efficiency (4.8–1.2), recent form (-1.5–-4.7).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–107.4), strength of schedule (-0.4–-2.0), shooting efficiency (51.3–51.1).