
UL Monroe
4-28GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.0%UL Monroe
89.0%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -15.4
PROJECTED TOTAL155.1
MODEL MONEYLINERice -809

Rice
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUL Monroe 70
Projected Total155.1
Projected ScoreRice 85
Team Comparison
30.9MMH Power Index45.1
101.1Offensive Efficiency108.3
117.1Defensive Efficiency109.2
-16.0Net Efficiency-0.9
-1.0Strength of Schedule-2.2
-16.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
71.7Tempo68.3
48.1%Effective FG%49.7%
16.9%Turnover Rate17.8%
25.3%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
40.6%Free Throw Rate34.7%
-11.5Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rice HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–30.9), offensive efficiency (108.3–101.1), defensive efficiency (109.2–117.1), net efficiency (-0.9–-16.0).
UL Monroe COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.0–-2.2), ball security (16.9–17.8), free throw rate (40.6–34.7).