
Belmont
26-6GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.9%Belmont
26.1%Lipscomb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBelmont -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL156.8
MODEL MONEYLINEBelmont -283

Lipscomb
18-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBelmont 81
Projected Total156.8
Projected ScoreLipscomb 75
Team Comparison
61.8MMH Power Index47.9
118.6Offensive Efficiency111.3
103.7Defensive Efficiency107.6
14.9Net Efficiency3.7
-0.2Strength of Schedule-2.5
10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
70.7Tempo68.8
60.7%Effective FG%54.8%
17.8%Turnover Rate16.0%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %25.9%
32.7%Free Throw Rate26.5%
10.5Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Belmont HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBelmont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.8–47.9), offensive efficiency (118.6–111.3), defensive efficiency (103.7–107.6), net efficiency (14.9–3.7).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHball security (16.0–17.8).