
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%Queens University
41.1%Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL165.3
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -143

Utah
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 83
Projected Total165.3
Projected ScoreUtah 82
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index43.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency108.8
117.0Defensive Efficiency115.8
1.4Net Efficiency-7.0
0.1Strength of Schedule5.1
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3
71.4Tempo68.3
56.6%Effective FG%52.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
37.6%Free Throw Rate32.2%
0.9Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–43.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–108.8), net efficiency (1.4–-7.0), recent form (1.5–-16.3).
Utah COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.8–117.0), strength of schedule (5.1–0.1).