
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Harvard
31.1%Northeastern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -5.1
PROJECTED TOTAL147.1
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -222

Northeastern
8-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 76
Projected Total147.1
Projected ScoreNortheastern 71
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index40.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency107.1
102.9Defensive Efficiency115.7
5.2Net Efficiency-8.6
-0.1Strength of Schedule2.7
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.0
64.8Tempo69.9
53.4%Effective FG%52.7%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.4%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
27.9%Free Throw Rate29.9%
3.4Average Margin-6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Harvard HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–40.9), offensive efficiency (108.1–107.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–115.7), net efficiency (5.2–-8.6).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.1), ball security (16.4–17.2), offensive rebounding (27.0–26.3).