
California
22-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.1%California
86.9%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL159.5
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -663

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCalifornia 73
Projected Total159.5
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 86
Team Comparison
56.5MMH Power Index68.9
111.8Offensive Efficiency120.9
104.8Defensive Efficiency105.7
7.0Net Efficiency15.2
2.8Strength of Schedule7.4
1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
69.9Tempo70.9
52.6%Effective FG%55.3%
14.9%Turnover Rate13.5%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
36.8%Free Throw Rate39.3%
4.9Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–56.5), offensive efficiency (120.9–111.8), net efficiency (15.2–7.0), strength of schedule (7.4–2.8).
California COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–105.7).