
Seton Hall
21-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.0%Seton Hall
68.0%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -5.7
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -212

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 66
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreHofstra 72
Team Comparison
57.1MMH Power Index59.3
105.8Offensive Efficiency114.0
98.3Defensive Efficiency100.9
7.5Net Efficiency13.1
3.5Strength of Schedule-2.9
0.6Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
66.5Tempo66.2
47.9%Effective FG%52.2%
16.7%Turnover Rate16.1%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
35.7%Free Throw Rate32.0%
5.0Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–57.1), offensive efficiency (114.0–105.8), net efficiency (13.1–7.5), recent form (14.0–0.6).
Seton Hall COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–100.9), strength of schedule (3.5–-2.9), free throw rate (35.7–32.0).