
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.4%Queens University
86.6%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -13.8
PROJECTED TOTAL168.8
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -646

BYU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 78
Projected Total168.8
Projected ScoreBYU 91
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index63.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency118.3
117.0Defensive Efficiency106.8
1.4Net Efficiency11.5
0.1Strength of Schedule6.5
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
71.4Tempo70.6
56.6%Effective FG%54.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.2%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
37.6%Free Throw Rate35.4%
0.9Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
BYU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–51.7), defensive efficiency (106.8–117.0), net efficiency (11.5–1.4), strength of schedule (6.5–0.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–118.3), recent form (1.5–-2.2), shooting efficiency (56.6–54.7).