UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.2%UT Rio Grande Valley
39.8%Charleston Southern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -1.3
PROJECTED TOTAL157.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -151
Charleston Southern logo

Charleston Southern

15-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 79
Projected Total157.6
Projected ScoreCharleston Southern 78

Team Comparison

55.8MMH Power Index47.5
112.6Offensive Efficiency110.1
103.1Defensive Efficiency105.7
9.5Net Efficiency4.4
-1.9Strength of Schedule-3.5
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.8
67.4Tempo75.8
55.7%Effective FG%55.3%
17.9%Turnover Rate18.4%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
29.6%Free Throw Rate30.8%
6.4Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–47.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.1), defensive efficiency (103.1–105.7), net efficiency (9.5–4.4).
Charleston Southern COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.6–29.2), free throw rate (30.8–29.6).
Final
UT Rio Grande Valley logo
UT Rio Grande Valley
86—76
Charleston Southern logo
Charleston Southern
UT Rio Grande Valley by 10 • 78.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATCharleston Southern
36-68FG27-56
53.0%FG%48.0%
4-233PT7-21
17.0%3PT%33.0%
10-13FT15-24
77.0%FT%63.0%
33Rebounds36
8Offensive Rebounds11
14Assists17
14Turnovers21
15Steals6
1Blocks5
22Fouls17

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hasan Abdul HakimG2510-130-24-400400024
K.T. RaimeyGuard226-102-50-010000014
Marshal DestremauF226-71-20-172100013
DK ThornGuard344-81-33-343400012
Trey MillerG276-100-20-244200012
Howie Fleming Jr.G202-60-32-23110006
Tommy GankhuyagForward131-20-11-13120003
J.J. HowardGuard61-20-00-01000002
Cliff DavisG220-50-20-03200000
Kwo AgwaF50-20-10-00001000
Jaylen WashingtonG30-10-10-00110000
RJ NanceGuard10-20-10-00000000
Charleston Southern
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Daylen BerryG314-81-49-1035310018
Taje' KellyForward368-140-00-281020016
RJ JohnsonG345-94-40-025000014
Lamar Oden Jr.Guard262-71-54-53100009
Jaylon GibsonForward203-40-01-45210007
Anthony GauseG222-91-71-23111006
Reis JonesF183-40-00-18001006
Keenan WilkinsGuard130-10-10-01210000

Advanced Game Stats

78.8Possessions78.8
109.1Offensive Efficiency96.4
96.4Defensive Efficiency109.1
12.7Net Efficiency-12.7
55.9%Effective FG%54.5%
58.0%True Shooting %56.4%
17.5%Turnover Rate27.1%
19.1%Free Throw Rate42.9%
33.8%3-Point Rate37.5%
1.00Assist / Turnover0.81
Game Summary
UT Rio Grande Valley won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 78.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.