Tulane

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.1%Tulane

82.9%Furman

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFurman -11.7

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -485

Furman

22-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTulane 69

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreFurman 80

Team Comparison

TulaneMetricFurman

44.3MMH Power Index53.9

105.3Offensive Efficiency113.3

109.9Defensive Efficiency105.1

-4.6Net Efficiency8.2

2.7Strength of Schedule-1.8

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6

68.7Tempo67.4

49.6%Effective FG%55.4%

15.6%Turnover Rate17.7%

22.8%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

44.8%Free Throw Rate32.6%

-3.2Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Furman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.3), defensive efficiency (105.1–109.9), net efficiency (8.2–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-1.8), ball security (15.6–17.7), free throw rate (44.8–32.6).

Final

Tulane

67—75

Furman

Furman by 8 • 66.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATFurman

23-54FG22-58

43.0%FG%38.0%

6-183PT13-36

33.0%3PT%36.0%

15-19FT18-22

79.0%FT%82.0%

36Rebounds33

9Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists19

12Turnovers7

4Steals6

5Blocks4

19Fouls13

Player Box Score

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Asher Woods	G	31	5-11	2-4	5-5	5	3	1	0	17
Gregg Glenn III	F	31	5-11	0-1	4-6	10	4	0	1	14
Mari Jordan	G	27	5-11	2-4	2-2	3	1	0	0	14
Tyler Ringgold	F	21	3-7	1-3	2-2	4	0	0	2	9
Kaleb Banks	F	27	2-4	0-0	2-4	3	0	1	2	6
Kam Williams	G	30	2-5	1-4	0-0	3	0	2	0	5
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	25	1-5	0-2	0-0	3	5	0	0	2
Percy Daniels	C	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Furman

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJay Smith Jr.	Guard	34	8-16	6-11	7-8	2	3	3	0	29
Nick Anderson	Guard	30	5-11	5-10	4-4	1	3	1	0	19
Davis Molnar	F	17	3-5	0-0	0-0	10	2	0	0	6
Cooper Bowser	F	22	0-1	0-0	5-6	2	2	0	1	5
Charles Johnston	F	17	2-6	1-4	0-0	2	2	1	0	5
Garrett Hien	Forward	21	2-6	0-3	0-0	6	2	0	2	4
Tom House	G	21	1-5	1-5	1-2	0	1	0	1	4
Eddrin Bronson	G	13	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	2
Ben Vander Wal	F	23	0-3	0-1	1-2	7	3	0	0	1
Mason Smith	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3

101.1Offensive Efficiency113.1

113.1Defensive Efficiency101.1

-12.1Net Efficiency12.1

48.1%Effective FG%49.1%

53.2%True Shooting %54.8%

18.2%Turnover Rate10.5%

35.2%Free Throw Rate37.9%

33.3%3-Point Rate62.1%

1.08Assist / Turnover2.71

Game Summary

Furman won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.