
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.5%UAB
86.5%High Point
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHigh Point -14.3
PROJECTED TOTAL160.6
MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -641

High Point
31-5MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 73
Projected Total160.6
Projected ScoreHigh Point 87
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index69
110.5Offensive Efficiency123.8
102.9Defensive Efficiency98.3
7.6Net Efficiency25.5
0.4Strength of Schedule-5.8
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency16.5
71.7Tempo72.4
48.8%Effective FG%56.6%
12.4%Turnover Rate12.8%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
36.9%Free Throw Rate42.4%
5.4Average Margin18.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
High Point HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–56.9), offensive efficiency (123.8–110.5), defensive efficiency (98.3–102.9), net efficiency (25.5–7.6).
UAB COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–-5.8), ball security (12.4–12.8).