
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
64.2%SMU
35.8%Butler
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -2.8
PROJECTED TOTAL163.8
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -179

Butler
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 83
Projected Total163.8
Projected ScoreButler 80
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index52.7
118.2Offensive Efficiency111.7
109.6Defensive Efficiency109.1
8.6Net Efficiency2.6
7.0Strength of Schedule3.1
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5
71.1Tempo71.1
55.7%Effective FG%51.2%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.9%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %34.4%
31.3%Free Throw Rate42.9%
6.1Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–52.7), offensive efficiency (118.2–111.7), net efficiency (8.6–2.6), strength of schedule (7.0–3.1).
Butler COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.1–109.6), free throw rate (42.9–31.3).